Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen RevisionVorhergehende Überarbeitung | |
| cagent:cagentuffmm [2024/09/26 12:42] – admin | cagent:cagentuffmm [2024/10/12 11:40] (aktuell) – admin |
|---|
| - [[https://www.uffmm.org/2024/09/21/chatgpt4-philosophy-how-we-should-free-democracies-from-inefficiency-improve-the-democratic-values/|CHATGPT4 – PHILOSOPHY : HOW WE SHOULD FREE DEMOCRACIES FROM INEFFICIENCY & IMPROVE THE DEMOCRATIC VALUES]] The Author: OK, I think we have detected a very interesting point of view to elaborate further the possible ‘fate of democracies’ in our dynamic world. I am planning the following steps how to proceed further: (1) I will post this dialogue so far in two of my main blogs ... then (2) I will analyze a bit more how we could transform Democracies 1.0 (lacking the needed efficiency) to a kind of Democracies 2.0 with a new approach to improve efficiency significantly by keeping the key values of democracy not only alive but ‘improve these values’ instead. @chatGPT4o: That sounds like a great plan! Your vision of transforming Democracies 1.0 into Democracies 2.0 by addressing efficiency while preserving and even enhancing key democratic values is a promising direction. I’m excited to see how your analysis unfolds, and I’d be happy to assist with any further insights, ideas, or refinements as you continue exploring this transformation. | - [[https://www.uffmm.org/2024/09/21/chatgpt4-philosophy-how-we-should-free-democracies-from-inefficiency-improve-the-democratic-values/|CHATGPT4 – PHILOSOPHY : HOW WE SHOULD FREE DEMOCRACIES FROM INEFFICIENCY & IMPROVE THE DEMOCRATIC VALUES]] The Author: OK, I think we have detected a very interesting point of view to elaborate further the possible ‘fate of democracies’ in our dynamic world. I am planning the following steps how to proceed further: (1) I will post this dialogue so far in two of my main blogs ... then (2) I will analyze a bit more how we could transform Democracies 1.0 (lacking the needed efficiency) to a kind of Democracies 2.0 with a new approach to improve efficiency significantly by keeping the key values of democracy not only alive but ‘improve these values’ instead. @chatGPT4o: That sounds like a great plan! Your vision of transforming Democracies 1.0 into Democracies 2.0 by addressing efficiency while preserving and even enhancing key democratic values is a promising direction. I’m excited to see how your analysis unfolds, and I’d be happy to assist with any further insights, ideas, or refinements as you continue exploring this transformation. |
| - [[https://www.uffmm.org/2024/09/26/philosophical-dialogue-with-chatgpt4-the-late-popper-and-the-new-statistics-popper-was-right/|PHILOSOPHICAL DIALOGUE WITH chatGPT4: The late Popper and the new statistics. Popper was right]] | - [[https://www.uffmm.org/2024/09/26/philosophical-dialogue-with-chatgpt4-the-late-popper-and-the-new-statistics-popper-was-right/|PHILOSOPHICAL DIALOGUE WITH chatGPT4: The late Popper and the new statistics. Popper was right]] |
| | - [[https://www.uffmm.org/2024/10/12/fatal-silence-the-hamas-israel-conflict-looking-more-deeper-a-podcast/|Fatal Silence – The Hamas-Israel Conflict, looking more deeper (A podcast)]] |
| |
| |
